it’s evident, if you look closely,
that the observer is the observed,
the thinker is the thought, and so on
(gratitude to J Krishnamurti for those powerful pointers)
but the person-problem remains:
who is this ‘observer-person’?
who is this ‘thinker-person’?
who is this ‘inquirer-person’?
the dynamics aren’t difficult to grasp
but who grasps?
and who then understands?
my Buddhist friends warn about dispensing with the ‘conventional’ self
but again I ask: who/what is it that dispenses – or doesn’t?
you can get bogged down in this mind-movie for great grey eons
before it loses its box-office appeal
I cast a look sometimes but boredom soon kicks in
while the wonders of unabridged Life never cease to amaze
Life’s naked beingness shines from ITself
and for ITself
4 thoughts on “life’s naked beingness”
Beautiful…”life’s naked beingness”…
… like a holy trinity …
“…who then undersands?”
Is it not Understanding, Consciousness itself? That is implied, for there is no ‘individual’ consciousness as such. Thank you.
Understanding, Consciousness, Awareness: Life’s wondrous way/s of loving ITself.
Thank you dear Martin.